Drawing for GREENPIPE

USPTO serial 75914075

GREENPIPE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREENPIPE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexandra J. Horne

DANA BRODY-BROWN DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP850 HANSEN WAY STE 200PALO ALTO, CA 94304-1017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE WHICH COLLECTS, AGGREGATES AND ANALYZES CUSTOMER AND THIRD PARTY INFORMATION ABOUT PIPELINES AND LINEAR ASSETS, TOGETHER WITH SOCIAL, CULTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION AND USES THIS DATA IN CREATING PREDICTIVE MODELS, REPORTS, DOCUMENTS, MAPS, PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AND ASSESSMENTS IN THE FIELD OF THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF PIPELINES AND OTHER LINEAR ASSETSACTIVE—
035COMPUTERIZED DATABASE MANAGEMENT SERVICESACTIVE—
037EXCAVATION AND REPAIR OF PIPELINES; CONSTRUCTION OF PIPELINES AND PIPELINE CROSSINGSACTIVE—
041TRAINING IN THE OPERATION OF SOFTWARE FOR USE IN PIPELINE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MANAGEMENT AND INTEGRITY MAINTENANCEACTIVE—
042TECHNICAL CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF PIPELINE INSTALLATION AND REPAIR, NAMELY, PIPELINE AND PIPELINE CROSSING DESIGN, PIPELINE INSPECTION FOR CORROSION AND COMPLIANCE TO STANDARDS AND CERTIFICATION OF PIPELINE INTEGRITY, PIPELINE RISK ASSESSMENT SERVICES, AND CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS (GIS); DATABASE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF PIPELINE DESIGN, PIPELINE SURVEYS AND WATERCOURSE CROSSING INSPECTIONS; SOFTWARE DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR OTHERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 7, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 25, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 9, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance