Drawing for PHOTORAMP

USPTO serial 75914119

PHOTORAMP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHOTORAMP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Terria P. Hicks

TERRIA P HICKS EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY343 STATE STROCHESTER, NY 14650-0205UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009(Based on Intent to Use) PHOTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT CONSISTING OF AN OPTICAL SCANNER, COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE SOLD AS A UNIT FOR PHOTOGRAPHIC AND DIGITAL IMAGING USERS, ENABLING THEM TO SCAN NEGATIVE FILM, PRINTS AND IMAGES FROM DIGITAL CAMERAS AND/OR UPLOAD DIGITAL IMAGES FOR STORAGE AND SHARING VIA REMOTE SERVER DEVICE AND ENABLING THEM TO CREATE OUTPUT PRODUCTS SUCH AS PRINTS OR COMPACT DISCS USING THE IMAGESACTIVE—
040(Based on Use in Commerce) ELECTRONIC SCANNING OF PRINTS AND PHOTOFINISHING, NAMELY, CREATION OF PRINTS FROM DIGITALLY SCANNED IMAGESACTIVEJan 30, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 16, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 23, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 3, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 10, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 11, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance