USPTO serial 75914260
LIFE ESSENTIALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIFE ESSENTIALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy J. Kelly
TIMOTHY J KELLY FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Prepared entrees or meals consisting primarily of meat fish, poultry or vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Prepared entrees or meals consisting of primarily of rice or pasta, confectionery products, namely, candy, chocolates, decorations for cakes, frozen confections, and bakery desserts | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Drinking water, soft drinks and fruit flavored drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Uncle Ben's, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Uncle Ben's, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named LIFE ESSENTIALS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 19, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |