USPTO serial 75914395
U.S. BUILDINGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with U.S. BUILDINGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT M. SCHWARTZ, ESQ.
ROBERT M SCHWARTZ ESQ RUDEN MCCLOSKY SMITH SCHUSTER & RUSSELL200 E BROWARD BLVDP O BOX 1900FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33302Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | STEEL PARTS FOR CONSTRUCTING STEEL BUILDINGS, NAMELY, STEEL ARCH PANELS FOR CONSTRUCTING CLEARSPAN, ARCHES, SKYLIGHTS, ENDWALLS, SERVICE DOORS, SLIDING DOORS, VENTILATORS AND BASE CONNECTORS | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 23, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |