Drawing for CARDHERO

USPTO serial 75914472

CARDHERO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARDHERO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jerald E. Nagae

JERALD E NAGAE CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON & KINDNESS1420 FIFTH AVESTE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Action skill games; articulated and non-articulated dolls, automatic coin-operated games; bath toys; bendable toys; board games; bop bags; carrying cases for toys; children's play cosmetics; Christmas tree ornaments; crib toys; costume masks; cube puzzles; decorative wind socks; dolls; electronic game equipment with a watch function; floating recreational lounge chairs, mattresses and pads; golf balls; hand-held video game machines; hand-held pinball games; hand-held unit for playing electronic games; hand-held units with a visual display for playing electronic games that simulate a pet; inflatable toys; in-line skates; jigsaw puzzles; jump ropes; kites; LCD game machines; manipulative games; manipulative puzzles; mechanical toys; music box toys; nonelectric hand-held skill games; paper dolls; parlor games; party favors in the nature of small toys; plush dolls; puppets; ride-on toys; role playing games; roller skates; rubber action balls; skateboards; skill and action games; snow boards; snow skis; sports balls; stand alone video game machines; stuffed, plush and cloth toys; toy action figures; toys and games, namely, coin and token-operated video game machines; toy bakeware and cookware; toy balloons; toy balls; toy banks; toy binoculars; toy building blocks; toy cap pistols; toy construction sets; toy figures capable of transforming into various shapes; toy key chains with and without sound device; toy mobiles; toy modeling dough; toy music boxes; toy plastic figurines; toy tea sets; toy vehicles; toy whistles; water squirting toys; wind-up toys; yo-yosACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 26, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 21, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 17, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 17, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 11, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 2, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 10, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 28, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 28, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 4, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 4, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 4, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 1, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 4, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 11, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 18, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance