USPTO serial 75914591
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TODD S. BONTEMPS
TODD S BONTEMPS COOLEY GODWARD LLPFIVE PALO ALTO SQ3000 EL CAMINO REALPALO ALTO, CA 94306-5000| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for electronic records management services for use in relation to document management, document retention, document organization, document storage, and document disposition | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF RECORDS MANAGEMENT, TRAINING AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY DOCUMENT AND RECORDS LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT, DOCUMENT AND RECORDS ORGANIZATION, DOCUMENT AND RECORDS RETENTION, DOCUMENT AND RECORDS DISPOSITION, AND DOCUMENT AND RECORDS LIFE CYCLE PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 22, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |