Drawing for SKYBASE

USPTO serial 75915309

SKYBASE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KOVALSKY, LAURA G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SKYBASE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ADAM D RESNICK

ADAM D RESNICK PIPER MARBURY RUDNICK & WOLFE LLP1200 19TH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035business marketing consulting services pertaining to customer relationship management for others; business marketing consulting services, namely, database marketing; telemarketing services; teleservicing for others, namely, initiating, receiving and responding to telephone and telefacsimile inquires to and from customers of other businesses; promoting the goods and services of others via direct mail and telephone; promoting the goods and services of others via an on-line electronic communications network by providing information for their customers; conducting primary and secondary business research; operating and managing telephone call centers; customer service fulfillment services for others, namely, responding to and confirming and filling customer orders for othersACTIVE
041training and educational instruction in the fields of telemarketing and teleservicingACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 28, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 5, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 23, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 14, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 13, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Mar 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 18, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 19, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance