USPTO serial 75915542
EVENTSMALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EVENTSMALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cupertino, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HEATHER ANGELINA DUNN
GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH LLP400 HAMILTON AVEPALO ALTO, CA 94301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer services, namely, providing on-line non-downloadable computer software that enables users to access and share data stored on personal computers and real time data, images and sound from remote locations via the Internet; providing electronic online greeting cards and business and social event invitations distributed via the Internet; dating services; party, business event and social event planning consultation; party, business event and social event planning; computer site development for others; computer network conferencing services; organization and management of information concerning services of others in the field of event planning | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |