Drawing for PHARBASE BENCHMARK

USPTO serial 75915901

PHARBASE BENCHMARK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHARBASE BENCHMARK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDWARD E. VASSALLO

EDWARD E VASSALLO FITZPARTRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-3801UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and CD-Roms and accompanying user manuals used to provide a database containing contact and other professional information for every board certified doctor in the United StatesACTIVE—
035Market research and information services and information technology services; and market research consulting services; and market research reports in computer readable format; all for the pharmaceutical and healthcare industriesACTIVE—
042Providing information services and information technology services for the pharmaceutical and healthcare industries, namely collecting and distributing information and data regarding doctors and other medical personnelACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 6, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 14, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 10, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 9, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 9, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 6, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 11, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 22, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 13, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 13, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 2, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance