USPTO serial 75915951
BAD CLAY FABLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BAD CLAY FABLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer L. Elgin
M FRANKLIN, R MCMURTRY, B PLOSKER TBS, INC LEGAL DEPT TRADEMARK GROUPONE CNN CTRC/O TURNER BROADCASTING SYSTEM INCATLANTA, GA 30303-2762Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment and education services in the nature of a continuing program series and motion picture films directed toward children and young adults, provided through cable television, broadcast television, broadcast radio and the global computer information network | ACTIVE | Oct 17, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 15, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 17, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 14, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |