USPTO serial 75916029
YOTTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YOTTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven R. Sprinkle
ALLYN TAYLOR GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH LLP2000 UNIVERSITY AVEEAST PALO ALTO, CA 94303-2248UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | OPTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK HARDWARE NAMELY, ROUTERS, SWITCHES, TRANSMISSION EQUIPMENT, CROSS-CONNECTS, MULTIPLEXERS, DE-MULTIPLEXERS, RECEIVERS, TRANSMITTERS, AND AMPLIFIERS, AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS SOFTWARE FOR ROUTING AND FORWARDING DATA AND NETWORK MANAGEMENT; TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR THE TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL SIGNALS OVER A FIBER OPTIC CABLE SYSTEM; OPTICAL LAYER TRANSPORT AND SWITCHING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, MULTIPLEXERS, OPTICAL GATEWAY MANAGERS, OPTICAL AMPLIFIERS AND OPTICAL CROSS-CONNECTS, AND COMPUTER OPERATING SOFTWARE THEREFOR; HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR COMMUNICATION AND DATA NETWORKING OVER AN OPTICAL FIBER NETWORK; OPTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, ROUTERS, SWITCHES, TRANSMISSION EQUIPMENT, CROSS-CONNECTS, MULTIPLEXERS, DE-MULTIPLEXERS, RECEIVERS, TRANSMITTERS, AND AMPLIFIERS, THAT IS SCALABLE, FLEXIBLE, AND MODULAR FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE OPTICAL NETWORKS; OPTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR ROUTING AND FORWARDING DATA AND NETWORK MANAGEMENT FOR USE WITH OPTICAL NETWORKS THAT ENABLE QUALITY OF SERVICE, DYNAMIC RESTORATION, AND DYNAMIC PROVISIONING USING DYNAMICALLY ROUTED WAVELENGTHS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | OPTICAL TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORK SYSTEM DESIGN, CUSTOMIZATION, IMPLEMENTATION, AND ADMINISTRATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 18, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |