CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SOLUS MICRO TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 75916265

SOLUS MICRO TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOLUS MICRO TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RENE A. VAZQUEZ

RENE A VAZQUEZ FLESHNER & KIM LLPP O BOX 221200CHANTILLY, VA 20153-1200UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Microelectro-mechanical components, devices and systems used for telecommunications and for controlling and transmitting optical signals, namely, optical switches, optical multiplexers, optical couplers, optical attenuators, adaptive focus lenses, tunable filters, tunable Fabry-Perot filters, optical waveguides, and optical wavelength translatorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 6, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 27, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 7, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 11, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 13, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 9, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 20, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance