USPTO serial 75916325
DURASHELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DURASHELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ST. LAURENT, QUEBEC, CA
LENNOXVILLE, QUEBEC, CA
LENNOXVILLE, QUEBEC, CA
ADVANCED FIBER TECHNOLOGIES (AFT) TRUST
LENNOXVILLE, QUEBEC, CA
Other trademarks owned by ADVANCED FIBER TECHNOLOGIES (AFT) TRUST
Lennoxville, Quebec J1M 2C3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SIMON LEMAY
SIMON LEMAY LAVERY, DE BILLY925 CHEMIN ST LOUIS S 500QUEBEC, QC G1S 1C1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINE PARTS, NAMELY, PERFORATED, DRILLED, PUNCHED, SLOTTED, MILLED, ELECTRON BEAM-BORED PLATES AND DRUMS IN THE NATURE OF SCREENS AND SCREEN PLATES FOR SORTING, SCREENING AND SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM FLUIDS OF DIFFERENT KINDS OF SUSPENSIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CAE ELECTRONICS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by CAE FOREST PRODUCTS G.P.
- Other trademarks owned by CAE INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ADVANCED FIBER TECHNOLOGIES (AFT) TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by CAE ScreenPlates Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named DURASHELL
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |