Drawing for COCOAPRO

USPTO serial 75916566

COCOAPRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COCOAPRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leslie K. Mitchell

LESLIE K MITCHELL FITZPATRICK CELLA HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZ FL 38NEW YORK, NY 10112-3800UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Mineral and aerated waters; non-alcoholic beer; non-alcoholic cocktail mixes; non-alcoholic wines; non-alcoholic punch; drinking water; sports drinks; and soft drinks; non-alcoholic fruit beverages and fruit juices, syrups and other preparations for making all of the aforementioned non-alcoholic beveragesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 17, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jun 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
May 27, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
May 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 3, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Dec 3, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Dec 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 20, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
May 20, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
May 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 14, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 3, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Dec 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 26, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 4, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 4, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 11, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 7, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 1, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Aug 17, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 12, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance