USPTO serial 75918439
CHICKEN SOUP FOR THE DENTAL SOUL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHICKEN SOUP FOR THE DENTAL SOUL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Barbara, CA
Santa Barbara, CA
Costa Mesa, CA
Costa Mesa, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD H ZAITLEN
RICHARD H ZAITLEN PILLSBURY MADISON & SUTRO LLP725 S FIGUEROA ST STE 1200LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-5443UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PAPER GOODS, NAMELY, A SERIES OF FICTION BOOKS, A SERIES OF NON-FICTION BOOKS, MAGAZINES, SYNDICATED COLUMNS, BULLETINS AND BROCHURES ALL FEATURING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF MOTIVATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL INSPIRATION AND ACHIEVEMENT AND INCREASING SELF-ESTEEM; PRINTED INSTRUCTIONAL, EDUCATIONAL, AND TEACHING MATERIALS FOR THE TEACHING OF MOTIVATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL INSPIRATIONS AND ACHIEVEMENT AND INCREASING SELF-ESTEEM | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Canfield, John T.
- Other trademarks owned by Canfield, John T.
- Other trademarks owned by Hansen, Mark V.
- Other trademarks owned by Hansen, Mark V.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named CHICKEN SOUP FOR THE DENTAL SOUL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 2, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 14, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |