USPTO serial 75918693
ADDVANTAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ADDVANTAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward D. Gilhooly & Associates
EDWARD D. GILHOOLY EDWARD D. GILHOOLY & ASSOCIATES28 EAST JACKSON BLVD.SUITE 423CHICAGO, IL 60604-2359Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | CARGO CARRYING VANS, NAMELY, TRUCK TRAILERS FOR COMMERCIAL USE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |