Drawing for TRUEDISK

USPTO serial 75919209

TRUEDISK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, HEATHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRUEDISK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Benjamin H Kaminash

BENJAMIN H KAMINASH ATER WYNNE LLP222 SW COLUMBIA STE 1800PORTLAND, OR 97201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER HARDWARE, CHIPS, CIRCUIT BOARDS, AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED FOR THE CREATION AND DESIGN OF CUSTOMIZED METADATA DIRECTORIES, FOR REMOTE AND LOCAL ACCESS TO ELECTRONIC FILES AND STRUCTURED AND UNSTRUCTURED DATA FROM ONE OR MORE COMPUTER SYSTEMS, FOR PERMITTING REMOTE AND LOCAL PROCESSING OF INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM ELECTRONIC FILES AND DATA SO ACCESSED, FOR REMOTE AND LOCAL STORAGE OF ELECTRONIC FILES AND STRUCTURED AND UNSTRUCTURED DATA, FOR REMOTE AND LOCAL MANAGEMENT OF ELECTRONIC FILES AND STRUCTURED AND UNSTRUCTURED DATA, AND FOR MANAGEMENT OF ACCESS TO SUCH FILES AND DATAACTIVE—
037MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER HARDWARE, CHIPS, AND CIRCUIT BOARDS FOR OTHERSACTIVE—
042DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION OF COMPUTER HARDWARE, CHIPS, CIRCUIT BOARDS, AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS USED FOR THE CREATION AND DESIGN OF CUSTOMIZED METADATA DIRECTORIES; DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS USED FOR REMOTE AND LOCAL ACCESS TO ELECTRONIC FILES AND STRUCTURED AND UNSTRUCTURED DATA FROM ONE OR MORE COMPUTER SYSTEMS, FOR PERMITTING REMOTE AND LOCAL PROCESSING OF INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM ELECTRONIC FILES AND DATA SO ACCESSED, FOR REMOTE AND LOCAL STORAGE OF ELECTRONIC FILES AND STRUCTURED AND UNSTRUCTURED DATA, FOR REMOTE AND LOCAL MANAGEMENT OF ELECTRONIC FILES AND STRUCTURED AND UNSTRUCTURED DATA, AND FOR MANAGEMENT OF ACCESS TO SUCH FILES AND DATA; MAINTENANCE OF DATABASES FOR OTHERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 18, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 3, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 14, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 24, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 19, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 2, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 15, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance