USPTO serial 75919219
INTEL NETSTRUCTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPKINS, TRICIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTEL NETSTRUCTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Clara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine M. Basile
Katherine M. Basile Reed Smith LLPP.O. Box 488Reed Smith Docketing DepartmentPittsburgh, PA 15230Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business solutions and network planning and consultation, namely providing online retail services featuring software packages, information technology solutions, and information in the fields of customer management, accounting, network security, and network solutions; technical consultation in the fields of project and account management for computer network integration projects, namely issuance of network security clearance certificates, tracking of network system components, cost accounting | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer consultation services; network consultation services; customer and technical support services, namely, providing information about the use, operation, configuration, integration, and maintenance of network systems on-site and by telephone, email, and the Internet technical support services, namely,troubleshooting computer and network software and hardware problems on-site, via email, telephone, and the Internet; customization, maintenance, and support services for computer and network software and hardware; providing on-line publications, namely books, brochures, technical papers catalogs and pamphlets in the fields of computing and networking; consulting services for the selection and implementation of business application software packages namely, accounting, manufacturing, configuration or distribution; providing computer and network; consulting and programming services related to networking applications; integrated business solutions computer services, namely, network systems analysis design and implementation of computer networks and web technology; computer system information protection services, namely, engineering and design of network security and network testing services; providing information on network security planning; updating of computer software and computer firmware | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 7, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 1, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |