USPTO serial 75919549
ATLANTIC CITY WEEKLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 13, 2002
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ATLANTIC CITY WEEKLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Review Publishing Limited Partnership
Philadelphia, PA
Other trademarks owned by Review Publishing Limited Partnership
Review Publishing Limited Partnership
Philadelphia, PA
Other trademarks owned by Review Publishing Limited Partnership
DAVENPORT, IA
CATAMARAN MEDIA COMPANY, L.L.C.
OMAHA, NE
OMAHA, NE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua J. McIntyre
Joshua J. McIntyre Lane & Waterman LLP220 N. Main Street, Suite 600Davenport, IA 52801UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | General circulation newspaper | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 13, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Review Publishing Limited Partnership
- Other trademarks owned by Review Publishing Limited Partnership
- Other trademarks owned by LEE BHM CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by CATAMARAN MEDIA COMPANY, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by BH MEDIA GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named ATLANTIC CITY WEEKLY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 13, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 11, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 11, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 9, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 16, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 31, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |