CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for CYBERCENTER

USPTO serial 75919573

CYBERCENTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3235502Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 1, 2007
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with CYBERCENTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Trademark Monitoring(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gretchen L. Testerman

Gretchen L. Testerman LUMEN TECHNOLOGIES931 14th StreetLaw DepartmentDenver, CO 80202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035DATA CENTER MANAGEMENT, DATA CENTER OUTSOURCING FOR INDIVIDUALS AND COMMERCIAL ENTITIES INCLUDING PROFIT AND NON-PROFIT ENTITIESACTIVESep 14, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 11, 2026ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 1, 2026REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2024ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 29, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2024ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 20, 2023ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 14, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2021EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jun 14, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 5, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 5, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 28, 2017NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2017RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jul 28, 201789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jul 28, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 22, 2017E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 1, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2012NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2012C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 19, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 21, 2012E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 1, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 20, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 7, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 7, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 3, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 22, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 22, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2006GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 2, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 2, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 1, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 31, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 9, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 30, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 29, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance