Drawing for BLENDER

USPTO serial 75919775

BLENDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLENDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathleen Cooney-Porter

KATHLEEN COONEY-PORTER OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER ET AL1755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYFOURTH FLARLINGTON, VA 22202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE THREE DIMENSIONAL GRAPHICS, ANIMATION, MODELING AND CREATING VIDEO GAMES; COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS; COMPUTERS; COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; MICROCOMPUTERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE FOR USE IN WORD PROCESSING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE FOR USE IN PROCESSING DIGITAL IMAGES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE FOR USE IN COMPUTER GRAPHICSACTIVE—
016INSTRUCTIONAL MANUALS FOR COMPUTERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER HARDWARE; PRINTED TEACHING MATERIALS IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER HARDWARE; BOOKS AND MAGAZINES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER HARDWAREACTIVE—
038TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION SERVICES; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND DATA VIA COMPUTER NETWORK SYSTEMS; PROVIDING ONLINE ELECTRONIC BULLETIN BOARDS FOR TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AMONG COMPUTER USERS CONCERNING TOPICS OF GENERAL INTEREST; PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKACTIVE—
042TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROBLEMS VIA TELEPHONE AND E-MAIL; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONSULTATION; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ONLINE MAGAZINES AND BOOKS IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER HARDWAREACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 11, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 18, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 8, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 22, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance