USPTO serial 75919976
NQMSPLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 14, 2003
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NQMSPLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Concord, Ontario, CA
Concord, Ontario, CA
Concord, Ontario, CA
EXFO ELECTRO-OPTICAL ENGINEERING, INC.
VANIER, CA
Other trademarks owned by EXFO ELECTRO-OPTICAL ENGINEERING, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SIMON LEMAY
SIMON LEMAY LAVERY DE BILLY925, CHEMIN ST-LOUIS STE 500QUEBEC CITY, QC G1S 1C1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software on CD-ROM, floppy disks, hard drives or accessible by electronic memory, including Random Access Memory, Electronically Programmable Read Only Memory and Erasable Electronically Programmable Read Only Memory, for use in the data communications and telecommunications industry for the purpose of monitoring, data communications and telecommunications networks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Consultronics Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Consultronics Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Consultronics Limited
- Other trademarks owned by EXFO ELECTRO-OPTICAL ENGINEERING, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named NQMSPLUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |