USPTO serial 75921696
DININGSPECIALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 29, 2003
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DININGSPECIALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mathew R. P. Perrone, Jr.
Mathew R. P. Perrone, Jr. Law Office of Mathew R. P. Perrone, Jr.210 South Main StreetAlgonquin, IL 60102-2639UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Restaurant food delivery services featuring orders placed by telephone, mail or the Internet | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 25, 2009 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 27, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |