USPTO serial 75921736
MEGAWAVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEGAWAVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Liberty Lake, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark W. Hendricksen
MARK W HENDRICKSENWELLS, ST JOHN PS601 W FIRST AVE STE 1300SPOKANE, WA 99201-3828Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | FIBER OPTIC CABLES; FIBER OPTIC TERMINATION CABINETS; FIBER OPTIC CABLE FRAMEWORKS FOR HOUSING FIBER OPTIC TERMINATION CABINETS; FIBER OPTIC TERMINAL BLOCKS; FIBER OPTIC CONNECTOR CABINETS, FRAMES AND BLOCKS; FIBER OPTIC PATCHCORDS; FIBER OPTIC JUMPER CABLES; AND MULTI-FIBER OPTIC CABLE CONNECTORS FOR CROSS-CONNECTING FIBER OPTIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 30, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 30, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |