USPTO serial 75922023
ULTRAPURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 6, 2002
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ULTRAPURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Stoney Creek, Ontario, CA
Stoney Creek, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy B. Berge
AMY B BERGE GREENEBAUM DOLL & MCDONALD PLLC3300 NATIONAL CITY TWR101 S FIFTH STLOUISVILLE, KY 40202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | zinc dust | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 10, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |