USPTO serial 75922251
MVP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINYK, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MVP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur A. Gardner
ARTHUR A GARDNER GARDNER & GROFF, PCPAPER MILL VILLAGE, BLDG 23600 VILLAGE TRACE, STE 300MARIETTA, GA 30067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software using a network management system for monitoring and controlling communications equipment and industrial equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |