Drawing for ANYWHERE

USPTO serial 75923152

ANYWHERE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLDEN, JAMES B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ANYWHERE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Vincent A. Sireci

VINCENT A SIRECI C/O TMSUMORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP1111 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Installation of digital, analog and hybrid satellite communication earth stations, portable satellite telephone receivers, voice data terminals and related satellite telecommunications equipmentACTIVE—
038Providing satellite telecommunication services, namely, the electronic transmission of voice, data, facsimile, video and information; providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network; webcasting and video-on-demand transmission servicesACTIVE—
042Design of satellite telecommunication systems for the transmission of voice, data, facsimile, video and information for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 19, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 5, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 5, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 10, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 25, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 11, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 17, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 28, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 28, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 28, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 9, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Apr 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance