Drawing for MODERN LUXURY

USPTO serial 75923321

MODERN LUXURY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2693696Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 4, 2003
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with MODERN LUXURY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. The Sladkus Law Group1397 Carroll DriveAtlanta, GA 30318UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Magazines featuring lifestyle editorial focusing predominantly on personality and celebrity interviews, fashion and accessories, jewelry, beauty, home design, dining out, entertaining at home, travel, arts and culture and philanthropyACTIVEMar 1, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 2023NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2023RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Sep 11, 202389AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Sep 11, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 1, 2023E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2022REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 26, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 11, 2013NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Feb 28, 2013NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2013RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Feb 28, 201389AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Feb 28, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 14, 2013E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 19, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 26, 2009PRANPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED—
May 14, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Apr 30, 2008E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2008C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 8, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 12, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Mar 5, 2008E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 5, 2007CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Mar 6, 2007CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Nov 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 21, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 3, 2003CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Dec 31, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 2002SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 28, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 13, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 14, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2001REINREINSTATED—
Jun 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 17, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance