CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for GOODLIFE

USPTO serial 75923753

GOODLIFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOODLIFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marlene J. Williams

MARLENE J WILLIAMS THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & STEINER LLPPO BOX 190187SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94119-0187UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029(Based on 44(e)) Sliced meats, namely ham, salami, turkey, chicken, bacon; wieners, namely beef, pork, chicken and turkey wieners; (Based on Intent to Use) frozen food products, namely processed meat, namely beef, pork and chicken, processed seafood, processed shrimp, processed fruits and vegetables; frozen potato products, namely frozen french fries, shredded potatoes, mashed potatoes, sliced potatoes, stuffed potatoes; entrees consisting primarily of meat and poultry and vegetables; seasoned potato curls; vegetable and vegetable/pasta entrees; fresh and frozen oriental food products, namely stir fry mixes; prepared frozen meat products, namely ham, bacon, wieners; hamburgers, filet mignon, meat balls, chicken breasts, fish, chicken a la suisse, chicken kiev, chicken marco polo, pork chops, sausage rolls; frozen prepared fish and chips; luncheon meats; meat snacks; namely chicken nuggets, boneless chicken balls, breaded chicken breast filet strips, marinated chicken wings and drummets and corn dogs; prepared salads, namely fruit salads, garden salads and vegetable salads; frozen appetizers, namely onion rings, breaded mozzarella sticks, battered mushrooms, battered mixed vegetablesACTIVE—
030(Based on Intent to Use) Bakery products, namely bread, garlic bread, croissants, pies, tarts, pie and tart shells, bagels, cakes, cookies, rolls, muffins, turnovers and doughnuts; cinnamon buns, frozen cookie dough, frozen bread dough, frozen pizza, prepared sandwiches; prepared salads, namely macaroni salads, rice salads and pasta salads; ice cream and frozen confections, namely, ice cream bars, ice cream sandwiches, sherbet, frozen fruit bars, frozen yogurt; fresh and frozen Mexican food products, namely burritos, tecquitos and tamales, frozen pierogies and meat pies, egg rolls, frozen vegetable and meat lasagnaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 5, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 3, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 22, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 21, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 21, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 20, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 20, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 25, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 25, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 25, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 16, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 16, 2007PBSRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Dec 22, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 30, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 29, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 22, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2006ZZBXALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-INADVERTENTLY ISSUED ACTION—
May 19, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 8, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 3, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 2, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 2, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 18, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 27, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 15, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 15, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 2, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 23, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 1, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 25, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 5, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 19, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance