USPTO serial 75923790
N Y TRANSIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with N Y TRANSIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barbara L. Friedman, Esq.
BARBARA L FRIEDMAN ESQ HANSON BRIDGETT MARCUS VLAHOS & RUDY, LL425 MARKET ST 26TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by New York Transit, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by New York Transit, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named N Y TRANSIT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 26, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 4, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |