USPTO serial 75923844
BACKWIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BACKWIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GREGORY P. GOONAN
GREGORY P GOONAN THE AFFINITY LAW GROUPONE AMERICA PLZ600 W BROADWAY STE 400SAN DIEGO, CA 92101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | promoting the goods and services of others by preparing and placing advertisements in an electronic advertising display accessed through a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | electronic transmission of data in the nature of newsletters on a wide range of topics for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LEAP WIRELESS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LEAP WIRELESS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Backwire.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named BACKWIRE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 5, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |