USPTO serial 75924023
ASHLEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASHLEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William A. Finkelstein
WILLIAM A FINKELSTEIN ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAHAN LLP1620 26TH ST FL 4SANTA MONICA, CA 90404-4013UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely, compacts, concealers, blushes, mascaras, make-up foundations, eye and eyebrow pencils, lipsticks, eye shadow, eye-liners, nail polish, nail polish remover, nail stencils, hard artificial nails, rouges, shampoos, skin soaps, liquid soaps for hands, face, and body, toilet soaps; bath items, namely, beads, crystals, foam, gels, oil, pearls, powder, non-medicated salts, bubble baths, shower gel; hair products, namely, conditioners, gel, lighteners, lotions, mascara, mousse, pomades, relaxers, relaxing preparations, rinses, spray, straightening preparations, styling preparations, waving lotion, hair dyes; skin care preparations, namely moisturizers, body lotions and creams; oils, namely, aroma therapy oils, baby oil, bath oil, body oil, massage oil, perfume oil and suntan oil; perfumery, namely, perfume, cologne and toilet water; and lotions, namely, suntan lotion, skin, hair, facial, body and hair waving lotions | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DUALSTAR ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Dualstar Entertainment Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Dualstar Entertainment Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named ASHLEY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2006 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |