Drawing for STARLINK DIRECT

USPTO serial 75924082

STARLINK DIRECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MADDEN, ANNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with STARLINK DIRECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL J. SMITH

MICHAEL J SMITH BLANK ROME COMISKY & MCCAULEY LLP1 LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036PROVIDING A WEB SITE THAT ALLOWS CUSTOMERS TO VIEW THEIR ACCOUNTS, REVIEW THEIR BILLING STATEMENTS, PAY BILLS AND MAKE CHANGES TO THEIR ACCOUNTS ALL IN THE TRUCKING AND VEHICLE LEASING AND FINANCING INDUSTRIESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 22, 2003PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Mar 12, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2003ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Dec 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2001CNRUDISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED—
May 19, 2001AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 11, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 17, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance