USPTO serial 75924617
ROBOWEB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROBOWEB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LISA M MARTENS
LISA M MARTENS COOLEY GODWARD LLP4401 EASTGATE MALLSAN DIEGO, CA 92121-1909UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software programs and associated user manuals, packaged and distributed together as a unit, for use in the design and generation of other computer software programs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 29, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 25, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 26, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |