Drawing for LOOK-HEAR

USPTO serial 75924627

LOOK-HEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LOOK-HEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CRAIG J.J. SNYDER

CRAIG J J SNYDER67 WALL STNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Dissemination Of Advertising For Others Via An On-Line Electronic Communications Network; Online Ordering Services Featuring Digitized Sound, Music, Spoken Word, Video, Photographic, Artistic, Holographic, Television And Motion Picture RecordingsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 21, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 16, 2007CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 15, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Jan 10, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jan 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 16, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 15, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 8, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Feb 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 4, 2006CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 4, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Dec 27, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Sep 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 27, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 24, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 23, 2005REINREINSTATED
Mar 9, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Mar 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 10, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 10, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Apr 21, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jul 26, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance