USPTO serial 75924627
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CRAIG J.J. SNYDER
CRAIG J J SNYDER67 WALL STNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Dissemination Of Advertising For Others Via An On-Line Electronic Communications Network; Online Ordering Services Featuring Digitized Sound, Music, Spoken Word, Video, Photographic, Artistic, Holographic, Television And Motion Picture Recordings | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |