USPTO serial 75924676
B2B LINKSHARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2601975Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 30, 2002
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with B2B LINKSHARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vanessa A. Ignacio, Esq.
Vanessa A. Ignacio, Esq. Lowenstein Sandler PC65 Livingston AvenueRoseland, NJ 07068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, INTEGRATED TRACKING AND MANAGEMENT OF COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS IN THE BUSINESS TO BUSINESS AND BUSINESS TO CONSUMER AREAS ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | EXPIRED | Feb 28, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 2, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 19, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |