USPTO serial 75925002
EPIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EPIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynn S. Cassan
BARRY E BRETSCHNEIDERSTE 5500 2000 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N SWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software applications for businesses in the area of workflow, operations, product integration and automation of forms-based processes through global computer communications networks, and for the development and integration of computerized forms and computer software for the creation of business applications and automation of forms-based processes through global computer communications networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | business analysis, namely, business consulting providing a detailed analysis of existing computerized infrastructure and business operations; workflow planning services, namely, the development of a written analysis of business operations and the use and integration of software applications into existing computerized systems; application development services, namely, the development of customized software to provide computerized tracking and reporting of business operations and to automate forms-based processes through global computer communications networks; form design services, namely, the development of customized electronic business forms and business form applications to meet the needs of business operations; integration services, namely, developing software for integrating customized software and computerized forms into existing computerized systems and automating forms-based processes through global computer communications networks, together with on-site installation; training services, namely, on-site training of users of installed software applications and computerized forms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |