Drawing for LOOK-HEAR

USPTO serial 75925720

LOOK-HEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LOOK-HEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Craig J.J. Snyder

CRAIG J J SNYDER67 WALL ST STE 2411NEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, conducting courses, seminars, conferences, workshops, symposiums and on-line tutorials and lessons in the fields of electronic commerce, visual arts, music, television production, motion picture production, telecommunications, software and computers and distributing course materials in connection therewith; providing information on the Internet in the fields of entertainment and education, namely, photographs, art works, musical works, stories, holographic images, television programs and motion pictures, general news in the fields of photography, art, music and storytelling; production and distribution of motion picture films; television show production; distribution of television programs for others; providing information in the field of entertainment in the nature of television, motion picture, video, radio and music programs; and providing indices and libraries of online media files for assembly of customized television, motion picture, radio and music programs and electronic magazines by othersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 21, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 16, 2007CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 15, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Jan 10, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jan 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 16, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 15, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 8, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2006CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 4, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Dec 27, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Sep 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 27, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 24, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 23, 2005REINREINSTATED
Mar 9, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Mar 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 10, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 10, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Apr 21, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 3, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 5, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 26, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance