USPTO serial 75925787
CINEMAVAULT.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 6, 2005
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CINEMAVAULT.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CATHERINE R. KEENAN
Anthony H. Handal Handal & Morofsky LLC501 Post Road EastFairfield, CT 06825UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | WHOLESALE AND RETAIL DISTRIBUTORSHIPS FEATURING MOTION PICTURES AND FILMS TO BUSINESS, RETAILERS AND TELEVISION STATIONS; WHOLESALE AND RETAIL DISTRIBUTORSHIPS FEATURING MOTION PICTURES AND FILMS IN THE FORM OF VIDEOTAPES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2023 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 17, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 31, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 10, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 7, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 28, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |