USPTO serial 75925948
TRACS-PAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRACS-PAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BACKNELL, BERKSHIRE RG12 1RG, GB
BACKNELL, BERKSHIRE RG12 1RG, GB
Bracknell, Berkshire RG12 1RG, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William A. Newton
ALLAN M LOWE LOWE HAUPTMAN GILMAN & BERNER LLP1700 DIAGONAL RD STE 300ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC TERMINALS TO BE MOUNTED IN A VEHICLE FOR USE IN DISPLAYING THE POSITION OF THE VEHICLE AND IN THE TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION OF TEXT MESSAGES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | TCAS | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED STAT IS TTAB | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 24, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |