USPTO serial 75926197
HUNGRY DOG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2901901Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 9, 2004
- Examiner
- DEJESUS, YSA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HUNGRY DOG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE S.A.
1800 VEVEY, CH
SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE S.A.
1800 VEVEY, CH
AMARILLO, TX
AMARILLO, TX
AMARILLO, TX
AMARILLO, TX
HEREFORD, TX
HEREFORD, TX
HEREFORD, TX
HEREFORD, TX
Hereford, TX
Hereford, TX
Hereford, TX
Hereford, TX
Hereford, TX
Hereford, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrea K. Cannon
Andrea K. Cannon Nestle Purina PetCare CompanyCheckerboard SquareLegal IP - 9TSt. Louis, MO 63164Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | [DOG FOOD AND] EDIBLE DOG TREATS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by MERRICK PET CARE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MERRICK PET CARE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BLUE SKY PETFOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BLUE SKY PETFOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TEJAS INDUSTRIES, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by TEJAS INDUSTRIES, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by GOOD PET PRODUCTS, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by GOOD PET PRODUCTS, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Hereford Bi-Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hereford Bi-Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hereford Bi-Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hereford Bi-Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hereford Bi-Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hereford Bi-Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named HUNGRY DOG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 9, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 14, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 14, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 16, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |