Drawing for WORLD PREFERRED

USPTO serial 75926219

WORLD PREFERRED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PRATER, JILL I
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WORLD PREFERRED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John F McKenna

JOHN F MCKENNA CESARI & MCKENNA88 BLACK FALCON AVEBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042providing information via a global computer network about suppliers of goods and services that have achieved registration to recognized management systems standards in the agriculture, forestry, fishing, mining, construction, manufacturing, transportation, communications, utility, retail and wholesale trade, insurance, finance, real estate, public administration and various industriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2001CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 22, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 14, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 23, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance