Drawing for THE CHANGING CHANNEL WWW.CHANGINGCHANNEL.COM

USPTO serial 75926472

THE CHANGING CHANNEL WWW.CHANGINGCHANNEL.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARTY, GEORGIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE CHANGING CHANNEL WWW.CHANGINGCHANNEL.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JONATHAN D. REICHMAN

JONATHAN D REICHMAN KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035COMMERCIAL INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF EDUCATION AND ENTERTAINMENT OFFERED VIA THE INTERNET AND TELEVISIONACTIVE—
041ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, AN INTERACTIVE PROGRAM IN THE FIELD OF FICTIONAL MOTION PICTURES, COMEDIES, DRAMA, REALITY SHOWS, ANIMATED CARTOONS, CHILDREN'S PROGRAMMING, NEWS, DOCUMENTARIES, SPORTS, TALK SHOWS, GAME SHOWS AND SOAP OPERAS OFFERED VIA THE INTERNET AND TELEVISIONACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 28, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 19, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 19, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 20, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 20, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 20, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 12, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 8, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 8, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 22, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 30, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 10, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 21, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance