USPTO serial 75926519
EASYGLIDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EASYGLIDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAY H. BEGLER
JAY H BEGLER BUCHANAN INGERSOLL PC140 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and computer hardware for effecting controlled measurement | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Facilitating communication by computers, process management, transmission of data and images through utilization of computer hardware, facilitating communication through computer terminals, scientific and industrial research, creation and management of websites on internet, facilitation of communication of national and international internet; broadcasting of messages and images with the help of a computer | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Preparation of data processing programs, providing access time to data banks; rental of access time to intenet services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 20, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |