USPTO serial 75926521
TOTAL-CRICKET.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOTAL-CRICKET.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul Dennis Connuck
PAUL DENNIS CONNUCK WHITMAN BREED ABBOTT & MORGAN LLP200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING FOR THE PRODUCTS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING SPORTING GOODS AND EQUIPMENT AND RELATED GOODS, PROVIDED VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | PROVIDING INFORMATION REGARDING CRICKET AND OTHER SPORTS AND SPORTS-RELATED TOPICS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; PROVIDING AUDIOVISUAL AND MULTIMEDIA REPLAYS OF SPORTS EVENTS OR PORTIONS OF SPORTS EVENTS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; PROVIDING A WEBSITE ON A GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK FEATURING LINKS TO THE WEBSITES OF OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF SPORTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ON-LINE FACILITIES FOR REAL-TIME INTERACTION WITH OTHER COMPUTER USERS CONCERNING CRICKET AND OTHER SPORTS AND SPORTS-RELATED TOPICS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WorldTel Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by WorldTel Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TOTAL-CRICKET.COM
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 14, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |