USPTO serial 75926554
SPIZZY !
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2989871Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 30, 2005
- Examiner
- CARTY, GEORGIA
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SPIZZY !?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dr. Mario Sergio Golab
Dr. Mario Sergio Golab INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY BUSINESS CONSULTANTS, PLLC1413 SANTA CRUZ AVETM DEPARTMENTCORAL GABLES, FL 33134Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Food additive for non-nutritional purposes, namely, a seasoning used as a flavor enhancer for foods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 2, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 9, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 7, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 22, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 6, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 19, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |