USPTO serial 75926571
ABSOLUTE NUTRITION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUTLAND, BARBARA A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ABSOLUTE NUTRITION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julianne B. Bochinski
JULIANNE B BOCHINSKIP O BOX 375CANTON, CT 06019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | VITAMINS, NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS, MINERALS AND HERBS IN THE FORM OF TABLETS, CAPSULES, POWDERS, AND LIQUIDS; INGREDIENTS SOLD AS A COMPONENT OF NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS, POWDERS AND LIQUIDS; ANTIOXIDANTS, AMINO ACIDS, AND METABOLITES; PROTEIN SUPPLEMENTS, POWDERS LIQUID DRINKS FOR MEAL REPLACEMENT, FAT REDUCERS, APPETITE SUPPRESSANTS ENERGY BARS, PROTEIN BARS; SKIN CREAMS, AND GELS FOR NATUROPATHIC PAIN RELIEF, AND NATURAL SELF-TANNING CREAMS | ACTIVE | Oct 8, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |