USPTO serial 75926767
BIG BEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIG BEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dana Hartje Cardwell
DANA HARTJE CARDWELL SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202-5141UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | TOYS AND PLAYTHINGS, NAMELY, CHILDREN'S WALL MOUNTED MULTIPLE ACTIVITY TOYS; CHILDREN'S MULTIPLE ACTIVITY FLOOR MATS; MANIPULATIVE GAMES; TOY BUILDING BLOCKS; AND GAME TABLES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |