Drawing for ALPHA UNIVERSITY

USPTO serial 75926800

ALPHA UNIVERSITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WINTERS, SHANNA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ALPHA UNIVERSITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael D. Pegues

Michael D. Pegues Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr, P.C.500 N. Akard Street3800 Lincoln PlazaDallas, TX 75200-6659

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, TANK TOPS, JACKETS, HATS, SHORTS, PANTS, SHOES, SOCKS, JOGGING SUITS, SWEAT SUITS, POLO SHIRTS, SWEAT PANTS, UNDERWEAR, SWIM WEAR, COATS, LEATHER COATS, BANDANNAS, SWEAT BANDS, BOOTS, GYM SHOES, TENNIS SHOES, AEROBIC SHOES, AND WALKING SHOESACTIVEJan 29, 1999
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PLANNING, ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING SEMINARS, CONFERENCES, AND WORKSHOPS IN THE FIELD OF DEVELOPING BROTHERHOOD RELATIONS SKILLS, PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT SKILLS, LEADERSHIP SKILLS, PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATIONS SKILLS, BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND UTILIZATION SKILLS, TRAINING IN COMMUNITY AND NATIONAL OUTREACH PROGRAMS, AND TRAINING IN CHAPTER AND OFFICER DEVELOPMENT SKILLSACTIVEJan 29, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2001ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Aug 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2001DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 2000DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance