Drawing for ISLAND NUTRITION

USPTO serial 75926825

ISLAND NUTRITION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ISAACSON, GINNY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ISLAND NUTRITION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel A. Weiss

DANIEL A WEISS JACOBSON & COLFIN, PC19 W 21 STNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Vitamins, mineral supplements, nutritional supplements, and herbal supplements containing amino acids, enzymes, phytonutrients, marine extracts, and herbal extractsACTIVEAug 11, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 2002PC.DPETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED—
Aug 23, 2002PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 18, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 22, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 29, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 22, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance